Before China, Obama like a frivolous, arrogant monkey

More than a month's time, the Chinese saw the performance skills that Obama showed: in December the sea and the Chinese leaders laughing immediately return a combination of punches on Chinese Canadian comic legs: trade sanctions on arms sales to Taiwan, Google Event to meet with the Dalai Lama. The most humiliating the Chinese people is that this young black president, a little face to China not to stay in China, preparing to issue a token of some U.S. arms sales to Taiwan-related sanctions on arms company, when the United States went so far off from the aircraft carrier to Hong Kong!


Like the United States is increasingly no. This rogue has been with the Clinton bombed the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia is no different. The United States has come to you the extent of any humiliate China. It is unique in the relations between big powers. And even the middle of international relations in general are rare. The United States has not ruined the Chinese eat quasi-US relations. Tomorrow I will write an essay, I would like to ask: the United States really is it so important? Why not to offend it?

Damage to the dignity of the United States through the Chinese crack down on Chinese people's morale, and in fact is a strategy of psychological warfare. It is the Chinese people in the anti-self-confidence. We Chinese must understand that the United States is an evil power. It is not as strong as it is shown. Many smaller countries have burst over the paper tiger it is the truth. Repeated condoning, it will only make it insatiable.

Finished "C-shaped surround," I have not relieved. How to control the rampage of the world's monsters, will become the focus of my next thought. The United States must be controlled! The United States also will be able to control! The premise is the need to go their way. We must not allow the United States does not pay the price to achieve its strategic objectives. Not only America's enemies should not be eliminated and should not be weakened. Like the jungle in the world, like China should maintain biological diversity.

Or Chairman Mao said, the good: The struggle to maintain unity while seeking unity in order to compromise the unity of seeking unity and die. Should we not hear that the U.S. is most afraid of the Chinese people then?


With the pro-Russian Ukrainian leaders coming to power, the United States in Central Asia will usher in a second failure. Russia's strategic counter-attack has achieved initial success. It is this victory, the U.S. strategists turned to Iran and China to seek strategic breakthrough. Pressure from China will be a significant increase in the future. China should prepare at least more than ten years to meet the U.S. strategic pressure.

The young Obama, like monkeys, like in China, before popping. It is just a puppet. American power family dog only. China should not have any thoughts of this person fee. Or to take good look at the nature of the United States. This is the one into the imperialist stage of capitalist countries. The United States will not allow China's development up, no matter what form. Peace, harmony not only confuse the other side, not to confuse themselves. China must be prepared to protest in advance.

The new government to repair the image of the United States National hawks increasingly lose power

Bush's 8 years, and its unilateral policy of reckless hawks of the United States power consumption seriously, seriously damaged the image of country. Obama to "change" under the banner of the White House, promised to repair the image of the United States, but people still doubt that if not because of the war in Iraq into a quagmire, if not because the financial crisis hit, will the U.S. government change its "hegemonic strategy"? Willthe hawks naturally disappear style吗? From Obama on China, Russia, Iran and other countries on the attitude of the past two months, hawks give the impression that the United States entered the impression of a low ebb. But many scholars believe that the United States, appointed from the Obama foreign policy team, the formation is "Since the most conservative since the Kennedy administration's foreign policy team." A Chinese expert properly this session than the characteristics of the U.S. government as a "hawk skin, doves heart." That there is certain is that, after all, the situation than people, and the current crisis, the conservatives have to the United States to seek cooperation in the world.

Hawks in the United States to enter the low

In March this year, some analysts believe that the hawks in the United States deliberately speculation the U.S. Navy to monitor ships and Chinese ships in the South China Sea, "stand-off" case, but also dished out the "Chinese Military Power Report," playing up "China threat" theory, but the action can hardly cover up the American Eagle gradually lose power and influence to send the truth. Hong Kong's "Economic Daily News," the analysts believe that after Obama took office, Secretary of State Hillary "focus on listening to more than confrontation," the United States military hawks increasingly lose power, because in the world media coverage, can not find any well-known hawkish remarks . In the case in the South China Sea, with the exception of the Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said, "We will continue this (monitoring) activities", only the United States Pacific Command before retiring at Keating suddenly tough message, saying that "China provocation. " Prior to this, relatively moderate Keating's attitude toward China.
According to Washington insiders know people who do analysis, American hawks are the most flourishing period of the early Bush administration in 2001, when four hawks Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bolton, respectively, vice president, national defense Minister, Deputy Minister of Defense, on behalf of the United Nations. "9.11" the ever-changing situations, because the Iraq war hawks and the war on terror slowly lost at an important position in government.

Dick Cheney, etc. Although people are not serving the government, it is still customary to make hawkish remarks. Russia "newspaper opinion" issued March 15, entitled "Cheney's criticism of Obama to make the United States is facing a new terrorist threat" to the article. The article said that Obama came into office, the Bush administration to change the very "hawks" and the diplomatic confrontation color line, so that a comprehensive U.S. foreign policy shift. This has led opposition to the U.S. hawks. On behalf of one of hawkish former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney in mid-March in a TV interview of President Obama to overturn Bush's anti-terrorism policy expressed strong dissatisfaction. Cheney said that this will result in not enough American security, they are faced with the threat of terrorist attacks. He also worried about the economic crisis Obama to expand the use of the functions of government.

"Reported that opinion," Bakiyev quoted the analysis of Russian analysts believe that even though Cheney's remarks sounded very far-fetched, but he hawks the United States reflects the actual ideas. The report also said that "9.11" before, Cheney, Rumsfeld and other hawks in the United States has been mainly dominated the Bush administration's security and defense policy. Hawks in the United States Congress, the business community, the media have a lot of supporters, a huge support network, in particular, the arms dealers who are more American hawks are the main background.

Obama Government "Paper hawks, doves heart"

Some analysts believe that foreign policy team Obama has emerged between factions. Vice-President from Biden, the Democratic Party, the Permanent Representative to the United Nations and the Secretary of State Susan Rice Hillary become one group, they think "the United States are unique in the world occupy the moral high ground of the country"; faction are also pragmatists, representative is the President for National Security Affairs Assistant Defense Secretary Robert Gates, such as Jones and the people from the Republican Party.

Singapore's "Lianhe Zaobao," published March 17 article said that in the Obama foreign policy team of two people, the Clinton and Jones is the president's diplomacy, "Heng Ha will be two." Once served as commander of NATO forces and U.S. Marines commander Jones gentleman has, but as a soldier, he was sternly criticized Bush's Iraq policy failures.

Scholars in the United States, who is the hawks who are doves, and sometimes the boundaries are not obvious. Patrick Frey and scholars in recent days the United States at the right-wing conservative forces of the John Birch Society magazine, said the author, the traditional conservative forces have hope through the outgoing Bush, Obama cleared his neo-conservative forces, but that is not such as people want, Obama is not that people look forward to the messengers of peace, which is mainly embodied in three aspects:

The first is the appointment of government officials in areas such as the hawks still have very strong color. Representative of neo-conservative David Horowitz believes that since Obama set up the most conservative since the Kennedy administration's foreign policy team. Biden selection as vice-president that the Democratic Party to defend "freedom and democracy" and the global forces at Obama government will prevail. In 1999, the United Biden is McCain and Lieberman on sending ground troops to Yugoslavia, which is neo-conservative think-tank with the "New American Century" happens to coincide with the aspirations. Hillary is the Democratic Party and the most support for the representative use of force against Iraq.

Secondly, the main battle over the appointment of hawkish Clinton and former government officials and neo-conservatism are inextricably linked in important positions, such as the Persian Gulf and South-West Asia Service is responsible for the Special Assistant to Dennis Ross, as well as hawkish leader of the Democratic Party , Afghanistan and Pakistan affairs envoy Richard Holbrooke.

Third, a strong color of its main battle staff. Phillips, former CIA officials warned that Obama senior adviser Dennis Ross have been involved in a major neo-conservatives from the working group. The group issued a report urging the new government to take tough stance against Iran at any time to launch a military offensive against Iraq to do a good job of preparation. Ross has also actively advocated the use of force against Iraq. In addition, some people even consider the appointment of Jones as the president's national security adviser is also a bad sign. "American Conservative Defense Alliance" of many classes that Jones advocated an increase in military spending, to the NATO forces stationed in the West Bank that will bring about the disastrous consequences. The United States Inghirami independent journalist and writer said that in foreign policy, Obama will continue to follow the Bush line, that is, "promoting democracy and pursuing a strong interventionist."

"This session features Obama Government can hawk skin, heart doves to describe." Research Center of Fudan University, deputy director of the United States Professor Wu Xinbo think, is the United States Government officials seem to be very much hard-line hawks, but at in specific policies, but would not necessarily show the style of hawks. The current crisis, the United States and China hope to seek the cooperation of the world as a whole. Government structures in the first team, the President Obama to take into account the opposition parties will probably have him too weak to attack the policy of cooperation, it seems necessary to choose some tough people to important positions and the implementation of constructive and cooperative policy toward China. The United States "Time" magazine in December last year, has published an article that Obama "cabinet of hawks" have their table only. "New York Times" columnist David Brooks believes that Obama's diplomatic point of view closer to the current reality than Bush.

Wu Xinbo think, of course, does not mean that such features will not be a hawk on China to make some little problem, after all, the long run, the hawks in the United States must have the market, but also must have the political opportunity. For domestic political needs, they would still be in the human rights, Taiwan and Tibet issues, said some remarks, but certainly not mainstream. In this regard, in order to prevent interference with the hawks of the overall situation of Sino-US relations, the Chinese should go as far as possible, "top line", bypassing the more hawkish gather mid-level officials, and direct contact with the most senior officials.

The United States has been overbearing hawks

"Global Times" reporter has a number of hawks in the United States has been in contact, they get the impression that is overbearing. Known as "old conservative Congress" George Ivanovich are the Code of Ethics Committee and the Senate Homeland Security and Chairman of the Political Committee, he has repeatedly advocated in Congress with China, India and other countries to compete and have a lot of criticism of Chinese society questions. At a gathering on the reporter asked him why the United States sometimes unjustified attacks on Mr China, he replied: "We are defending our freedoms and values that Americans have a responsibility to bring happiness to the world ... ..." and then hastily turned elsewhere, with others, talk to the other questions.

At present, the hawkish U.S. policy that the main idea and some from the conservative think tank. The Reagan administration the United States mid-level officials of the Department of Defense, is responsible for the United States Center for Security Policy Frank Gaffney have people in front of the reporter said: "The US-China relations will be how to develop? Frankly, is to move towards conflict. The United States policy toward China not enough hard-line, should be more alert. "

China policy, the rise of the hawks in the United States before and after 1995. At that time, subject to the impact of neo-conservative ideas, the political rise of the United States the so-called "foreign policy community", they claimed the "Blue Army", an objective assessment of those who ridiculed the people of Sino-US relations are at "to speak Chinese," and as "Red Army." This is because the United States at military exercises, on behalf of blue square (the U.S.), while the Red Army on behalf of the enemy. These "blue" but some think tank, the first circle of Friends Street, F Street in Washington, usually the "American Hotel" or a person's private residence in the meeting, discuss the country are, then, the team slowly grow, spread to the News , politics, lobbying circles. Between them using mass e-mail or private online forum for exchange of needed goods, and gradually formed a circle in Washington, asked tough "with China the value of consensus."

There is the main representative of these hawks, "Weekly Standard" editor-in-chief William Crystal, well-known columnist Robert Kagan, "Washington Times" Bill Gertz senior reporter, "The New York Times" columnist Rosen Tartu and the "Atlantic" magazine journalist Benjamin Schwartz et al. These people have a strong voice in China, but also has close ties with politicians, if a politician came to power, they will probably have to seek high. Such as the United States before the general election in 2008, Washington insiders have speculated that if McCain wins, Robert Kagan will be Secretary of State.

All kinds of hawks States

To bring other countries on the Internationally "hawks", has told Israel's Ariel Sharon and Palestinian hard-line recently, such as re-hawk Benjamin Netanyahu to form a cabinet. In Russia, the representative of Russia to NATO Rogozin has always been a result of internal affairs and diplomacy at the extreme position held by "komsomolets Moscow" and other media as a hawk, he advocates the Russian nationalist and fierce criticism of the United States is well-known, "are one people to own and without compromise known diplomat. " Russian Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky and Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov also be regarded as a hawk. The latter was also a tough and pragmatic, in the Russian won the "Patriot pragmatism" of the title.

Indian hard-liners to bring, people will naturally think of Vajpayee, Defense Minister George Fernandes of the time. Shortly after taking office, Fernandez, have spoken repeatedly about the "China threat theory" and led India's nuclear tests, but also a threat to "wipe from the map of Pakistan." In recent years, the Indian National Congress Party, "Three veteran North Korea," Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee at the current treatment often surrounding the relationship between the hard-line stance. But the whole, have been bred in India, this "non-violent non-cooperation" movement of the country, several hard-liners will eventually be returned to after a tough and pragmatic. Even if the fee's, but also in the delegation to visit China during the SARS, the Chinese feel the sincerity of the development of bilateral relations, attitudes toward China after returning up at a 180-degree turn.

In Japan there is also closer to the hawkish style of "hardliners" and, if more extreme nationalist sentiment, but also of the United States dare to say "no" to the current Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara. Japan's political arena in recent decades, there have been Kakuei Tanaka, Yasuhiro Nakasone and other "pragmatic hardliners," Junichiro Koizumi, has also this kind of "extreme hard-liners" and Taro Aso, this kind of "hardliners II" (from a political family, Although nurtured by the neo-conservative, but with some flexibility). JCC in Japan by the Japan Research Institute Chang-yan think, strictly speaking, Japan's post-war American hawks did not really, this is the post-war control of Japan by the United States, a major political and diplomatic decision-making must be the only lead the United States, mainly from the United States security commitment to the core of most politicians also have the context of the United States, and thus will be the United States has remained largely consistent with the political groups.

How surprise!Obama inauguration photos were processed with photoshop actully

Recently seen on a network at Obama's inauguration scene photos ultra-ching, which claims 14.7 million pixels. But look carefully, we know that these photos have been using photoshop deal, so many photos on the Opera made many mistakes. The United States has such shoddy cameraman of "work", I feel ridiculous!

Local image

bodyguards or ghosting？

bodyguards or ghosting

Mask politician

Mask politicians

Bosom beauty with the thigh

Too large coat

The head out from the belly up drilling

The Big terrible barrelf

Terrible ghosting

The tuner with 4 hands

The woman with 3 legs but without head

The transparent people

The transparent people

The transparent people

The broken trombone

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Experts: Chinese investment in the United States bond yields close to zero!

Federal Reserve (Fed) HKNPL want to buy one trillion U.S. debt rescue the market, will affect China's two trillion near the huge foreign exchange reserves, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Finance, Director of the Center for Chinese Economic Evaluation of Liu Yu-hui said that at present the United States bond yields close to zero, so China's U.S. dollar assets investment risk can not be underestimated.

In the United States assets of 1.4 trillion U.S. dollars
"Time Weekly" reported that at 1.95 trillion U.S. dollars in China's foreign exchange reserves, the share of dollar assets by about 70%, or nearly 1.4 trillion U.S. dollars, one of the United States treasury bonds for 727.4 billion U.S. dollars, the United States accounted for 23.6 percent of total government bonds, The United States accounted for 6% of external debt. Chinese buy another "two rooms" bonds 376,000,000,000 U.S. dollars, together with other agencies a total debt of about 510.6 billion U.S. dollars, in addition to investment companies in the United States financial institutions, equity investment over 13 billion U.S. dollars, while the SAFE foreign investment more than 90 billion U.S. dollars. Second half of last year, China surpassed Japan to become America's largest creditor.
U.S. Treasury Department information shows that Chinese investment in the United States is not conservative, even radical significantly. From the look in January, the United States long-term government bonds to buy 5.05 billion U.S. dollars, sold 4.428 billion U.S. dollars; buying agency debt 2.607 billion U.S. dollars, sold 4.428 billion U.S. dollars at the United States ...... Chinese investors on the financial markets are extremely active.
Data from January, the Chinese hold to the "two rooms" based agency debt up to 510.671 billion U.S. dollars, representing a 9 at the end of 2008 the 525.331 billion U.S. dollars is only a decrease of 2.8%. This shows that the United States National credit, are really worthless.
Chinese financial markets in the United States active not only in bonds, the high-risk stock market is also doing my part. According to U.S. Treasury data, 2007 at the end of the 6 Chinese holders of the stock assets of the United States was only 28.519 billion U.S. dollars, by 6 at the end of 2008 reached 99.548 billion U.S. dollars. In the following Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered the United States stock market fell in a row, did not significantly reduce, to the one at the end of this year, remains at 99.178 billion U.S. dollars to maintain the huge positions.
Stock investment losses
Such a big risk exposure, the investment carrying huge losses, has been an open secret, and the Earth people are aware the United States the Dow since last September has dropped around 40%.
People in the industry have said that in the past 10 years, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange Management of foreign exchange reserves of the overall profitability of the general. Apart from a few years ago, a slight balance, the most years in the relative devaluation of state assets. Especially since last year, the United States economic recession cause substantial depreciation of U.S. dollar assets exist substantial risk, making SAFE volcanoes such as sitting.
British "Financial Times" quoted the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, Brad Sezer economists estimate that 15% of the investment in accordance with the terms, including "two rooms" and other agencies debt, equity investment, these assets initially investment capital has approximately 250 billion U.S. dollars, with the present rate of depreciation of the stock look, there may be 80 billion U.S. dollars of floating loss. However, for this kind of message did not respond to the SAFE. In fact, the SAFE faces difficult choices. SAFE in the past year the proportion of the assets of the currency adjustment, the euro has not only failed to rise, but relative to the dollar, some depreciation of the currency conversion by the loss of reserves. Reuters said that hedge funds demand and reflux the United States dollar became the financial crisis, one of the strongest currencies, partly due to the U.S. dollar led to the devaluation of non-US dollar assets, China's foreign exchange reserves in January for the month drop in 2000 probably has a single the highest month on record.
In addition, SAFE has also carried out the stock and bond investment, through its institutions in Hong Kong, including the purchase of Total, BP, including some of the energy company's stock and corporate bond holdings of these shares, however, allegedly until the "two room" when the bond was hosted by the stop.
The above-mentioned people in the industry said that the principle of the SAFE assets under management are safety, liquidity, hedge against inflation. Currently, apart from the three objectives of this mobility, the other two are faced with enormous challenges.
The United States bond yields close to zero
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao at the United States worried about the safety of the assets, Obama said swore at ease. However, the United States Government is committed to the security, rather than yield. Investment security is at the United States national credit guarantee, but the investment earnings rate, but only the market to answer it.
"At present the United States bond yields close to zero, the future of interest rates high pressure makes Impairment of Assets." Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Finance, Director of the Center for Chinese Economic Evaluation of Liu Yu-hui said that the risk of U.S. dollar assets should not be underestimated, regardless of the future How interest rates can only be upward, it highlights the risk of long-term debts. At the same time, short-term debt bubble components is relatively large.
Liu Yu-hui that the current United States, Europe's benchmark interest rates have reached zero interest rate or zero interest rates to move, either as government bonds or corporate bonds, fixed income products that tend to bubble. Credit throughout the United States to create mechanisms to a standstill, and nothing to show for financial institutions, the market's long-term interest rates have remained high.

U.S. Net-surfers laugh at their own warships collided: Obama the gas was blown up!

U.S., "Hartford" Kursk on the 20th at the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea connecting the Strait of Hormuz and the U.S., "New Orleans, its" amphibious dock landing ship collision. As the world's most sophisticated on the Navy's country, this incident caused a great shock American. The United States has friends on the ship collided with commanders carried out a laugh at, think friends have the strength of the U.S. Navy is waning, Obama criticized the government "good show" diplomatic posture.
The United States ships in the Strait of Hormuz near the crash happened, the Americans are extremely shocked. The Associated Press quoted the United States Lexington Institute military researcher Rolland Thomas as saying that at the world's most sophisticated Navy in the case of internal collisions also "unheard of." The United States at many forums and blog networks, many users also expressed the same view. User has ridiculed that Obama was president of the ships of the commanders are not competent technical gas blown up! An American friends are saying: "The waters of the United States now must take care of the whale."
Most users will be directed against the United States Barack Obama "to reduce defense spending" will. Fitsnew web article said the United States, U.S. Navy now has been too weak to such an extent that we even could not stop in Africa, a group of pirates riding a motorboat. If so, how do we had to deal with Iran? This is really a sad thing. The article said that Obama "hurry want flattering that he could not prevent their collision with the two boats.
Truthdig website said the United States, the United States Navy ships collided in the waters near Iran, and on the same day, Obama Videos on Iran through the good show and the release of a new diplomatic message. And not too long ago, former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney has just criticized Obama so that the safety of the United States declined. Lot of American friends will be linked to the above-mentioned case appeal said, "I very much miss Dick Cheney." A netizen called gary's think it is time to revitalize the U.S. military strength.

Empty pack: Unfortunately, history will prove that Obama can save America!

Empty pack of the "American-style eight-part essay"
Edit a site you want me to comment on Obama's new book, "We believe that change." He sent the book are, I can easily read, at any rate to write reviews.
Fortunately, this book does not look thin, in fact, not much character over soon after. Frankly, This is a full chapter empty, quackish atmosphere, extremely single people read the book, it is the only value to us to provide an understanding of the world's most powerful people have a window.
This book are on the second part of Obama's policy strategy, the latter part of his campaign speech 8. We always said that Chinese-style pack Bagu empty, no content, may be not as good as the book Let's do, except him bragging or boasting, even as our substance often used to make fun of the "mobilization of the report."
Him in this book, all are totally unrealistic promises to give people this, to give ordinary people that may have a slogan, I do not see any operational feasibility. He even said: the United States by 2050 to reduce carbon emissions 80 percent. This has the possibility of it? There is!
First, human beings have been put before the oil run out, and there is no carbon can be discharged; two are fighting a nuclear war; there is also possible the two are one again. If you do not happen on the history of mankind The biggest disaster, the United States by the year 2050 carbon emissions growth can not be immune. Obama to put the people of these United States told it?
Himself thought about this problem? Of course, by 2050, Obama had no idea where, and now casually blowing on it. But this is a responsible attitude吗?
I remember, I was called Xiaojun said: Mei-Mei Kau Chinese domestic pro-US faction, was elected at Obama on the question has been divided into two factions, those who pro-Mei-Mei Kau Although the United States, the United States but there is no flesh-and-blood feeling , or see the young people are cheering Obama's win, but those who have really wholeheartedly loyal to the United States, with the United States close as flesh and blood, there is relatively knowledgeable Mei-Mei Kau pro-American, but all in due oba Horse of the election for the United States worry about. These really look my allegiance to the Chinese people see the United States was still at stake.
Obama was elected President of the United States, the United States is indeed a joy, I have watched Chinese TV, Chinese experts are also a joy, both the United States think a lot of problems can be solved. I really doubt it very much.
The United States to solve the problem today is the light should not shout slogans, you have to give something, we must find the source of things. Conservation of energy, physical immortality, are the basic laws of physics, nobody can go beyond. Then we take a look at, it is necessary to give the United States realize Obama promised the people who would like to give the benefits, as well as his "green" concept, where the source?
In my opinion, the first source can only realistically demand that the United States are the people to ride out the storm, to a certain extent to change their extravagant lifestyles. Of course this matter is very difficult, from frugal to extravagant easy, by the extravagance frugal difficult. But Obama could make use of its high popularity, and guide the people to the United States in the same direction.
After all, even if the United States are true to reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent, it is only now reached the Chinese per capita carbon emission level can be done now that China is also still alive, why Americans can not? At least to some extent on changing the extravagant lifestyle, the United States are all "change" basis. Without this foundation, all the so-called "change" is only empty talk.
But Obama's policy strategy and the speech did not involve such a direction, but can give off more extravagant promises of life. That is to say, where Obama shout themselves hoarse cry of "change" is just a look to the sky "change" promises a pie hypocrisy, and many Americans believe that such a promise, it shows they will not have What Offer.
The second source is rich, that is, the United States the rich get surgery, take things from them, that is left to implement economic policy. Obama has this meaning, it also makes the United States at home and abroad, leftists ecstatic. But he took office, the left's economic policy in the end the promise will come true? If you do not deliver, he lived up to today filled with hope that the election came to power put him voters.
Although the United States after the presidential election on the general election will promise a discount, but you totally not count or speak a lot of questions. If you honored? Taxes, to punish those who put the business moved to the United States overseas enterprises? If so, they simply can not when the United States business enterprise, how you? Now the world is not ready to implement the economic policy left a lot of places, so do If Obama is likely to put off business, that's not give the U.S. economy worsened it?
Take the immediate things that the U.S. Big Three auto companies, if not the drastic reduction of wages, or at least reduce the U.S. foreign auto plants, such as Toyota, Nissan, Honda and other levels, that is not saved.
Even if it can save months, only a year or so, or not be able to save Forever. Therefore, it is necessary to save the American economy, the economic policy of the left simply is not feasible, we must in some places than it is now left, and some places than it is now right. Obama has the political intelligence to do it? Has the political capital to do it? These are not my watch.
Obama is now in his inaugural speech has been published. His inaugural speech short, it is clear to go, "the socialist road." He said: "small government, big society" not to do on your quarrels, and I the big government on a big government; the free market do not do your quarrels, and my government intervention of the government intervening. This seems quite Roosevelt's spirit, but I have already said that today the United States and Roosevelt is very different time:
Roosevelt's time the United States, strong production capacity, surely it is an overproduction, the problem of insufficient effective demand, and the United States today, it already owes the debt, rather than insufficient effective demand, but domestic production capacity simply can not meet its own consumer desires of the problem. Prescription rule with the same symptoms exactly the opposite, I look to a bigger problem.
I really do not see Obama will be better able to put the United States from the financial crisis save. I have said, the United States financial crisis has a profound reason, generally, is that it, in every respect, old, American "children of the Eight Banners" of the.
Problem of an aging American society makes today's financial crisis in the United States did not so severe in 1929, than it was a bigger problem, for anyone, but like Hillary, McCain, such as at least sound a little less wind that cow.
The third source is a foreigner. First, cheating, cheating foreigners money. At the United States after the unexpected financial casino, the difficulty of this matter more and more high, and everyone not only to accept the lesson, but also money to be fooled by it ---- only want to go to Wall Street may be "hunters" of the Chinese comprador also China ready with money to take the initiative to go was it cheating. Two foreigners are to borrow.
May be present, there is no guarantee that European allies in their own, they would very tight money, the money may not help it. Even the United States the most iron, is also the most wealthy ally Japan, are all continuous reduction of the United States government bonds.
Only to pay it a regular beat, was it as a potential enemy of China, there are still dedicated to its holdings of treasury bonds, but the dissenting voices in China increased gradually so that any person, to the United States no longer has deep feelings to a lot of money to help it when there is fear heart.
The fourth source could only be robbed. Super-strong military force the United States, the United States This is the only prominent strengths. My boss has a friend who are American, and she at my blog on the Guest Book Road: "The United States has sub-bosses and we talk about the United States fiscal deficit are difficult to resolve, and I said there is a lot of natural resources in Alaska, the United States can use this as a mortgage repayment .
Him without hesitation to say that there had truly suffered years the United States can not continue, the worse we have so many troops can go out money, why should the seller when it? "It seems that American is still quite candid, straightforward and in times of economic crisis they first thought is to use the armed forces go out robbing. This is my look very representative of American opinion, but those journalists, professors, politicians may not so straightforward to say so. However, as I have said before, the American fight in Iraq has been proven inefficient, if trying to scramble for Iraq is also much more powerful than the country does not necessarily earn.
Obama is not a withdrawal from Iraq and focus to China and Russia for a more strategic threat to Afghanistan, Pakistan frontline吗? However, manufacturing or fueling tensions, inciting other countries to fight, and then sell arms to make money, the United States is indeed a long item. Therefore, the Middle East, such as the tense situation in the subcontinent of South Asia should be expected.
Obama rock star-style "change"
In short, the United States are not the problem be solved so easily, no one in power can not be easily resolved, but the Obama rock star-style governance are even more will not work. I watch him in power than Hillary, McCain, and even George W. Bush. Maybe someone will say that the United States political system is good, be able to check a no political experience and wisdom of the president, or even be able to restrict a mess of the President, I recognized at a considerable extent on that. But this way, the United States so-called "change" has become a nonsense.
Someone put the United States elect a black president this matter are the United States consider itself an important change in society, which means that the United States think of racism in society has been completely cleared and that the people of all ethnic groups all over the world are moving toward a one world important milestone. "New York Times" said that Obama was elected the United States has removed "ethnic barriers," some Chinese scholars also said that Obama was elected the United States shows the race to downplay the problem. I must not look. First of all, the United States or the race will not solve the problem, have the possibility of deterioration.
If so good race problem to solve, and now the United States should have been non-existent boundaries between whites and blacks live together the ---- are several hundred years, and should have been more or less assimilated. May be the fact that the boundaries between white and black or clear-cut exists. This time, if only the white vote, Obama still lost.
Some people say that Obama has the Democratic Party in recent decades has created a white voter at the highest support rate, but, taking into account the years George W. Bush is unpopular both inside and outside the policy and financial crisis caused by the incomparable weather, favorable terrain, and, if Obama was a white, I think he must also win at white voters.
Again, you take a look at McCain's speech to concede defeat when the scene: the presence of almost all white, when McCain said Obama was elected to congratulate when an audience boos. Pro George W. Bush to step down at the time there is a speech, warned Republicans not to have much hatred for Obama, this is precisely described in the Republican Party of grievances against Obama for the past more than a general change of regime.
In my opinion, some of the United States the concept of strong white racism but rather because this time the failure has become more "racist" and there is probably more from the idea into action. Of course, the United States also has a considerable number of whites are immersed in their country to elect a black president give them moral superiority, the United States the most recent public opinion polls also show that most people are willing to give Obama more time to obtain effectiveness.
But I think that this American delighted by the absence of Obama bring them rapidly to keep pace with the substantive benefits, I hope soon turned into disappointment, which they instinctively racist sentiment, will also up?
At an international level, said the United States are facing greatly complicated the international situation, and I doubt Obama can do a better job. Obama is elected, cheers in Europe than the United States is also strong, and look forward to the United States will abandon Bush's unilateral time, just tough. However, to abandon unilateralism and hard-line policy, the United States in the field of international relations on the question must be addressed? There are some questions.
One is the question of Iraq. Obama campaign prepared to honor the promises it made when, in his 16 months withdrawal from Iraq and focus on Afghanistan吗? Now a lot of support for him all the people of the United States look forward to fulfilling their promises, he does. If he really can be done, for the United States in the Middle East influence and control exactly what it means?
It's hard to say. All that can be said is that Obama is prepared to concentrate troops to Afghanistan, Pakistan, the frontline in order to strengthen the containment of China and Russia, the United States national interests may be a correct choice. Another Russian problem, the Russian attitude to the challenges the United States are obvious. Russian President Medvedev was elected at the same day Obama delivered his State of the Union strongly condemned the United States, and clearly announced:
Because the United States to deploy anti-missile system in Europe, the Russian missile forces refuse to dissolve the three groups, at the same time ready to deploy at Kaliningrad "Iskander" missile system, clear the hard-line posture of confrontation. Compared to that period after the Cold War the United States dominance of one pole of a golden era in Russia's confrontation posture makes the United States are facing today's international situation greatly complicated.
Whoever is president when the United States, this is a problem, Obama will be able to do a better job? I doubt. But rather because Obama is black people belong to ethnic minorities in the international issue, if handled properly, he will be more than a white President of the criticism and suspicion.
The inauguration of Obama, went to two million people, a warm atmosphere to the extreme. There is no doubt that people today fall into a loss of its flawless circumstances, the United States needs a rock star look like the president to mobilize the sentiments of everyone so that everyone temporarily forget the reality of embarrassment. Really excellent rock singer Kelly at the scene put the mood of the mobilization to the U.S. such as the rocket soared, but the show must go home, scattered and the U.S. face the reality.
In my opinion, no matter how warm the people are now the United States to support Obama, as long as he could not bring immediate tangible benefits, the United States today, demonstrated by his support for national unity, will soon be converted into doubt, criticism and split, the higher the expectations, the greater the disappointment. In today's difficult times, from the ethnic minorities as president, the success will stop immediately, otherwise they would soon be transformed into a disadvantage, he would not be the majority ethnic background of the president could get the kind of understanding and trust.
Me in front of the majority of judgments from the point of view of the United States. I do not intend to "jinx" the United States, I just say some of their own doubt, to remind everyone except one other than the possibility of optimism, rather than necessity. I sincerely hope that the success of the people the United States. From the Chinese point of view, we need the United States are warning of serious crisis, in order to select out of the crisis of war or instigation of the war.
Therefore, Cheung Siu-yin, General December 2, 2008 in the "Liberation Army Daily" published the article that "We must abandon the 'peaceful army, to build peace army' concept, firmly establish the idea of the ready to fight", is very correct and timely.