Recently, a post worth considering, this post is from a Vietnam Navy officer's blog. Bowen said that China is very advanced very powerful warships, fighters advanced than Vietnam, but these can only make the Chinese people psychologically satisfied, in fact, no useful.
Compared with the Chinese Navy, the Navy in Vietnam very much, only a few a few missile boats and frigates, warships can not be called composition, and only have to contend with China's SU-27 fighter support, so the U.S. Navy said they were "the most backward in Southeast Asia The. " But the Vietnamese soldiers went on to went on to say: It Together, this missile boats and frigates, warships can not be called the composition of the most backward of the Navy in Southeast Asia, but in control of the South China Sea 24 islands, and security of their control of the South China large sea oil and gas resources in Vietnam in the 80's on a lot of exploitation of the South China Sea oil and gas resources in the occupied islands, it is in such naval escort for completion.
South China Sea oil and gas resources in the occupied islands, a steady stream of transport back to the mainland, so that in 80 years ago was a net importer of oil and gas in Vietnam became one of the world's oil and gas exporting countries, China is now a large number of annual oil imports from Vietnam Gas! The Vietnamese military also said that although we compare the Chinese Navy, but Navy our country attaches great importance to the building of the Navy development top priority. Our large-scale military exercises held each year, every year at the three armed services in the North Bay comprehensive exercise several times each year, held in the South China Sea islands occupied comprehensive navy and air force exercises. Vietnamese leaders and the government is now explicitly requires us to: to ensure that the North Bay and South China Sea islands occupied the safety and "prosperity", to ensure that these areas and waters in the event of "insecurity incidents" and "territorial dispute" when the attack quickly eliminated enemy.
Moreover, the Vietnamese military also said that the Vietnamese Navy, is currently seeking to purchase from Russia and India, the new naval equipment, and thus to achieve the quality leap in the Navy in Vietnam. Finally the Vietnamese soldiers shouting: We will tell every Chinese, in the North Bay and South China Sea occupied islands 上, every day is a continuous development of the "Vietnam Navy" Patrol Ji alert, 让 Chinese do not dare to jump one step forward!
After reading Sven, grasses and sealing hui died of septicemia, although the text has traces of boasting, but most of the basic truth. Indeed, far more powerful Chinese navy in Vietnam, but Vietnamese control of the South China Sea islands, the largest, not only that also have non-stop exploitation of oil and gas resources, thus making the Vietnamese oil and gas importer from the leap to exporting countries, and even some oil and gas are also exported to mainland China. Vietnamese so arrogant with what? Is Zhezhi dilapidated Vietnamese Navy, this navy though backward, but can be rushed to the front line to Vietnam exploiting the boundary. Our navy? Control of the South China Sea islands, not only pathetic, but also watched much of the surrounding small Navy rushed to occupy our island.
Moreover, nothing was done about the Chinese navy in the East China Sea, a tightly controlled the Diaoyu Islands on the hands of the Japanese navy, the Chinese navy is stunned by even the edges are not up. China's navy weak it? No, we are very strong. Currently, the total number of 300 000 Chinese Navy, including naval air 25000, coastal defense forces 25 000, Marine Corps 40,000; we have to make super powers are formidable submarine force, with 25 destroyers, 47 frigates vessels, large landing ship 18; addition to our missiles, torpedoes, anti-submarine helicopter and ship-based helicopters are also very good, aircraft carriers, also allegedly construction. Despite the large gap between the United States, but the gap is small compared with Japan, and Southeast Asia with our fundamental differences on several orders of magnitude. Especially Vietnam, the nearest but also a good brother socialist countries in Southeast Asia known as the worst of its naval power, occupy most of the South China Sea island of China.
When asked why at this time to stir up Vietnam in the South China Sea dispute, Phoenix Qiu Zhenhai military observation room commentators said: "Vietnam is attempting to deepen its South China Sea, the influence of the parties in order to enhance the parties in the South China Sea The actual position of the ASEAN countries on the South China Sea to the problem caused by a common concern to ASEAN or the South China Sea, the power of the parties together against China in order to achieve the further erosion of its purpose and the occupation of the South China Sea. "
According to reports, nine Vietnamese, Vietnam vigorously promote marine development strategy in an attempt to keep the Navy as the pioneer expansion to the ocean, to become the 21st century, ASEAN and the world maritime power. As Vietnam's unique strategic position at sea, another in the Nansha area there are territorial disputes with China, therefore, particularly its naval development trends of concern.
Recently, it was reported that Russia's ties News, Vietnam, the Navy is building 30 to 40 400 tons of warships, and plans to invest 3.8 billion U.S. dollars, in northeastern Vietnam build a major naval port area of 3,000 hectares. It is estimated that the military port, once completed, will be able to stop 40,000 tons-class ships, not only can ease the Vietnamese warships docked in the plight of the Southern Cam Ranh Bay base, but also greatly enhance the Navy's infrastructure construction in Vietnam, Vietnamese troops combat support capabilities to a new level. While also replacing a number of far Cheng Duihai warning radar, to strengthen the monitoring efforts of the South China Sea.
Vietnamese military official said: "Since 2005, purchased from Russia 11 SU -27 fighter, the Vietnamese Navy's air combat capability greatly enhanced, while the purchase of Su-30MK, m-28H, card -31 and -39, and other advanced fighter Su The plan, also implemented in an orderly manner with. Vietnam plans to build a modern navy 2015. then, the Vietnamese Navy's ocean escort capability and combat capability at sea, to modernize the Navy's requirements. "
According to the Singapore media said: "At present the Vietnamese troops still Russian naval surface ship missile boats, except the purchase of four Russian-made 'poison spider' class missile boats, the use of Russian technology in the domestic construction of six missile BP50 boats and KBO2000 missile frigates and entered active duty, the water has been a qualitative leap in combat capability; the original capacity of the Vietnamese Navy's underwater warfare poor, but since the purchase of two pocket-sized Korean submarine, the submarine combat has taken initial shape. At present, Vietnam is preparing to set up submarine force, and plans to buy Russian Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines. " (From: China Military Report )
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the South China Sea. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the South China Sea. Tampilkan semua postingan
Senin, 02 Agustus 2010
Sabtu, 31 Juli 2010
U.S. touched successfully the real situation in China, and will soon hit China heavy fist
Korea and the U.S. on July 25 morning at 7, officially launched the Sea of Japan military exercise, in at 17 o'clock on the July 28 end. The People's Liberation Army is on at 15 o'clock on the on the 28th by the Nanjing Military Region and the Jinan Military Region, sea and air forces into two major military exercises, the timing of the ROK-US military exercises performed to the end, the choice of the time shows the official attitude negative, not a pre-emptive and tit for tat struggle, there is a difference branch to meet in order to pacify the aggrieved national patriotic heart of the factors that mixed in there, but the People's Liberation Army to carry out sea and air military exercises, it should be applauded for large increases.
Personally, I think, the Chinese government in dealing with the issue of ROK-US speech, there were some deficiencies and shortcomings:
First of all, by the People's Liberation Army Central Military Commission, Foreign Declaration: People's Liberation Army has never given up the study of Mao Zedong Thought, in the current new international and domestic situation, on a more in-depth study of Mao Zedong Thought, Mao Zedong Thought under the People's Liberation Army is fighting militants invincible, and always will beat back all the invading enemy. Americans in the Korean War failed to bring that history is not only heart aches, but also feel lingering fear, we want to grasp it, such a mentality to U.S. imperialism in Mao Zedong's military thinking of the strong shock and awe, the feeling not to act rashly and chill.
Second, the wording of diplomatic not tough enough, tough enough. China should not blindly oppose the ROK-US protest and speech, should be released so relentlessly to voice strong opposition to U.S. Han Huanghai exercise. For example, China should declare the period of time in the ROK-US Multimodal speech will be in the Yellow Sea coast 12 miles offshore in international waters outside the missile test, the nuclear experiment, the prohibition of navigation of vessels and aircraft of States, such as by nuclear attack China will not be responsible.
Third, China's military options for the time lag Multimodal speech. China should not choose to play the end of the ROK-US to conduct land and air military exercises, should be chosen for large-scale military exercises during the ROK-US speech to the United States that China's military exercises direct supposed enemies of the United States and the United States Army, ROK-US speech directly to the fight against target set for the Chinese, that China still Sha dissembling, simply and directly pick out the purpose of exercise, not better.
Fourth, the Chinese army in the South China Sea and Yellow Sea should be the same time sea and air military exercises. This is to show that such a battle the U.S. determined that China has the ability to address both the capacity of the sea on two fronts, first in the United States imposing and mentally overwhelming.
If China can play in the ROK-US military exercise before and during the struggle to take tit for tat, then China will have demonstrated as a tiger, while the U.S. has become more and more like a paper tiger, can be treated as the official in the performance out on the ROK-US speech missteps and lack of lung power, but the United States become more and more like a tiger, but everywhere in China revealed some characteristics of a donkey, the United States fight back, but also "numerous angry", and brutally kicked after a few, make people feel lost pride and dignity.
Since May 1999 the U.S. bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia to the present, has been ten years, and in this decade, the United States has been thoroughly in China, its fundamental purpose is to split China and destroy China. By bombing its embassy in Yugoslavia, India and other countries to provoke territorial disputes with China, to provoke Japan, Southeast Asia and China's sea waters island disputes and South China collision, openly entered the South China Sea measured levels of escalating arms sales to Taiwan and support at home and abroad ** elements, openly support the Dalai clique to split China, and recently just for the Korea-US joint military exercises, and so on. The United States in China's real situation during the decade can be said to successfully touch the bottom, it is important to grasp the information available that what? I personally think that the following points:
First, Chinese people believe the current level of Mao Zedong Thought. The degree of belief of Mao Zedong Thought, the official folk belief greater than the degree of belief. Mao Zedong Thought is subversive plot to stop U.S. imperialism and the destruction of China's socialist system and a strong barrier to split China, Mao Zedong Thought as long as China is also deeply rooted in the minds of the majority of people, U.S. imperialism and the destruction of China's attempts to dismember conspiracy will not succeed.
Second, there is a lot of Chinese people, Mao Zedong who was also a legacy of the heroic sacrifice of defending the homeland and fighting spirit. It is that of defending the homeland from the Chinese folk heroic spirit, so that U.S. imperialism has been reluctant to take drastic action against China, just select continue to explore the action.
Third, the Chinese government's pro-US forces in size. From the official acts of the U.S. imperialist hegemony, the weakness of a series of protests, China's official pro-US forces have developed to a great deal of power, enough to make the Southern Song Dynasty in China longer follow the perfunctory way.
Thoroughly American view of the above circumstances, in the future, China will adopt the following policies:
First, continue to support a large number of pro-American running dog to go crazy to attack civilian and demonize Mao Zedong, the total destruction of the Chinese people's belief in Mao Zedong Thought, Mao Zedong Thought is not the faith of the United States can do whatever they like in China.
The second is to remain in the economic field officials and lackeys of big train, traitor, and traitors. This point, the U.S. imperialists satisfied, if not the patriotic forces of the powerful folk, the United States had launched the invasion of China or a conspiracy to split China.
Third, will continue to support the forces of Westernization within China to launch color revolutions. We can well imagine the political future of China will be a great turbulence.
Fourth, continue to increase support "Tibetan separatist," "East Turkistan separatists" and other separatist forces. Time in the future, "Tibetan separatist," "East Turkistan separatists" and separatist activities of separatist forces will increase, China will intensify the violence in border areas and frequent.
Five neighboring countries of China, under the provocation in the United States, and China will continue to for the territory, territorial sea and other border disputes, a large-scale friction. The purpose of the United States but with the elements in China's Westernization color revolution.
Some people may say, and the above mentioned issues, the United States has been in operation very early, but I say that the United States will increase its progress in these areas, and its efforts 将 enhanced tremendously.
Now, many people hate to talk about the domestic war, which is unusual wrong. War is the continuation and development of politics is to achieve political ends ways and means of final settlement. War is an integral part of politics. War is the only way to guarantee peace, only focusing on peace, not war to protect, such a peace is short-lived, as the Southern Song court, as the cruel Yuan eventually wear out and die. Ancient Chinese Emperor Tang Taizong Li Shimin Liu Che and well versed in the logic of war and peace. Hun and Han, Turkic, and the Tang Dynasty, are the number one power at a world-class, only if the Han and Tang choose a path of peace to make a living, I am afraid the Chinese would be gone. Han and Tang have chosen to war to protect peace, not only destroyed the Huns and Turkic peoples of the two strong regime, its remnants will be rushed to the far West, only the Han and Tang Dynasties prosperity and strong. Chinese emperor Liu Che and Li Shimin of the great man. After the founding of Mao Zedong, have chosen to war to protect peace, through the Korean War, the Sino-Indian war in southern Tibet, the Sino-Soviet war and a series of wars Treasure Island, shot a peaceful situation in China for decades, and the failure of Mao Zedong to grips U.S. imperialism, and still is a lingering fear, scared be terrified to mention the Korean War. Thus, contrary a strong Chinese dynasties dynasty, there were not chosen to war to protect peace, hand, those who choose the path of peace perfunctory are weak dynasty, ultimately can not escape that fate left in the history of the contributions very small.
Some people worry that if China were to take drastic action, and the United States, accidental discharge, it is entirely not to worry, the U.S. is just a paper tiger, you're strong, and it retreated. The United States gave up a joint military exercise in the Yellow Sea is not a good proof?
Personally, I think, the Chinese government in dealing with the issue of ROK-US speech, there were some deficiencies and shortcomings:
First of all, by the People's Liberation Army Central Military Commission, Foreign Declaration: People's Liberation Army has never given up the study of Mao Zedong Thought, in the current new international and domestic situation, on a more in-depth study of Mao Zedong Thought, Mao Zedong Thought under the People's Liberation Army is fighting militants invincible, and always will beat back all the invading enemy. Americans in the Korean War failed to bring that history is not only heart aches, but also feel lingering fear, we want to grasp it, such a mentality to U.S. imperialism in Mao Zedong's military thinking of the strong shock and awe, the feeling not to act rashly and chill.
Second, the wording of diplomatic not tough enough, tough enough. China should not blindly oppose the ROK-US protest and speech, should be released so relentlessly to voice strong opposition to U.S. Han Huanghai exercise. For example, China should declare the period of time in the ROK-US Multimodal speech will be in the Yellow Sea coast 12 miles offshore in international waters outside the missile test, the nuclear experiment, the prohibition of navigation of vessels and aircraft of States, such as by nuclear attack China will not be responsible.
Third, China's military options for the time lag Multimodal speech. China should not choose to play the end of the ROK-US to conduct land and air military exercises, should be chosen for large-scale military exercises during the ROK-US speech to the United States that China's military exercises direct supposed enemies of the United States and the United States Army, ROK-US speech directly to the fight against target set for the Chinese, that China still Sha dissembling, simply and directly pick out the purpose of exercise, not better.
Fourth, the Chinese army in the South China Sea and Yellow Sea should be the same time sea and air military exercises. This is to show that such a battle the U.S. determined that China has the ability to address both the capacity of the sea on two fronts, first in the United States imposing and mentally overwhelming.
If China can play in the ROK-US military exercise before and during the struggle to take tit for tat, then China will have demonstrated as a tiger, while the U.S. has become more and more like a paper tiger, can be treated as the official in the performance out on the ROK-US speech missteps and lack of lung power, but the United States become more and more like a tiger, but everywhere in China revealed some characteristics of a donkey, the United States fight back, but also "numerous angry", and brutally kicked after a few, make people feel lost pride and dignity.
Since May 1999 the U.S. bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia to the present, has been ten years, and in this decade, the United States has been thoroughly in China, its fundamental purpose is to split China and destroy China. By bombing its embassy in Yugoslavia, India and other countries to provoke territorial disputes with China, to provoke Japan, Southeast Asia and China's sea waters island disputes and South China collision, openly entered the South China Sea measured levels of escalating arms sales to Taiwan and support at home and abroad ** elements, openly support the Dalai clique to split China, and recently just for the Korea-US joint military exercises, and so on. The United States in China's real situation during the decade can be said to successfully touch the bottom, it is important to grasp the information available that what? I personally think that the following points:
First, Chinese people believe the current level of Mao Zedong Thought. The degree of belief of Mao Zedong Thought, the official folk belief greater than the degree of belief. Mao Zedong Thought is subversive plot to stop U.S. imperialism and the destruction of China's socialist system and a strong barrier to split China, Mao Zedong Thought as long as China is also deeply rooted in the minds of the majority of people, U.S. imperialism and the destruction of China's attempts to dismember conspiracy will not succeed.
Second, there is a lot of Chinese people, Mao Zedong who was also a legacy of the heroic sacrifice of defending the homeland and fighting spirit. It is that of defending the homeland from the Chinese folk heroic spirit, so that U.S. imperialism has been reluctant to take drastic action against China, just select continue to explore the action.
Third, the Chinese government's pro-US forces in size. From the official acts of the U.S. imperialist hegemony, the weakness of a series of protests, China's official pro-US forces have developed to a great deal of power, enough to make the Southern Song Dynasty in China longer follow the perfunctory way.
Thoroughly American view of the above circumstances, in the future, China will adopt the following policies:
First, continue to support a large number of pro-American running dog to go crazy to attack civilian and demonize Mao Zedong, the total destruction of the Chinese people's belief in Mao Zedong Thought, Mao Zedong Thought is not the faith of the United States can do whatever they like in China.
The second is to remain in the economic field officials and lackeys of big train, traitor, and traitors. This point, the U.S. imperialists satisfied, if not the patriotic forces of the powerful folk, the United States had launched the invasion of China or a conspiracy to split China.
Third, will continue to support the forces of Westernization within China to launch color revolutions. We can well imagine the political future of China will be a great turbulence.
Fourth, continue to increase support "Tibetan separatist," "East Turkistan separatists" and other separatist forces. Time in the future, "Tibetan separatist," "East Turkistan separatists" and separatist activities of separatist forces will increase, China will intensify the violence in border areas and frequent.
Five neighboring countries of China, under the provocation in the United States, and China will continue to for the territory, territorial sea and other border disputes, a large-scale friction. The purpose of the United States but with the elements in China's Westernization color revolution.
Some people may say, and the above mentioned issues, the United States has been in operation very early, but I say that the United States will increase its progress in these areas, and its efforts 将 enhanced tremendously.
Now, many people hate to talk about the domestic war, which is unusual wrong. War is the continuation and development of politics is to achieve political ends ways and means of final settlement. War is an integral part of politics. War is the only way to guarantee peace, only focusing on peace, not war to protect, such a peace is short-lived, as the Southern Song court, as the cruel Yuan eventually wear out and die. Ancient Chinese Emperor Tang Taizong Li Shimin Liu Che and well versed in the logic of war and peace. Hun and Han, Turkic, and the Tang Dynasty, are the number one power at a world-class, only if the Han and Tang choose a path of peace to make a living, I am afraid the Chinese would be gone. Han and Tang have chosen to war to protect peace, not only destroyed the Huns and Turkic peoples of the two strong regime, its remnants will be rushed to the far West, only the Han and Tang Dynasties prosperity and strong. Chinese emperor Liu Che and Li Shimin of the great man. After the founding of Mao Zedong, have chosen to war to protect peace, through the Korean War, the Sino-Indian war in southern Tibet, the Sino-Soviet war and a series of wars Treasure Island, shot a peaceful situation in China for decades, and the failure of Mao Zedong to grips U.S. imperialism, and still is a lingering fear, scared be terrified to mention the Korean War. Thus, contrary a strong Chinese dynasties dynasty, there were not chosen to war to protect peace, hand, those who choose the path of peace perfunctory are weak dynasty, ultimately can not escape that fate left in the history of the contributions very small.
Some people worry that if China were to take drastic action, and the United States, accidental discharge, it is entirely not to worry, the U.S. is just a paper tiger, you're strong, and it retreated. The United States gave up a joint military exercise in the Yellow Sea is not a good proof?
Jumat, 30 Juli 2010
Obama stands for "return" to Southeast Asia, the United States intervene in the South China Sea into a high-profile
China Military Report: South China Sea island territorial disputes "related to U.S. national interests", U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has in the ASEAN Regional Forum meeting of the remarks can be said to really surprises. In quite a long time to take on the South China Sea policy is not directly involved in the United States, Why is gradually changing attitudes, and even sudden high-profile public intervention necessary? It contains behind what the U.S. strategic considerations?
Once behind the scenes spoiler
South China Sea was the Soviet Union during the Cold War confrontation with each other, supremacy of the seas, the two countries were established in the Philippines and Vietnam naval base. By the "Vietnam syndrome" of the impact of 80 Americans in the late 20th century into a deep self-reflection, and produce a "stay away from Southeast Asia" in the mood. After the Cold War, U.S. troops to leave the Philippines.
Since then, the South China Sea, the East Asia strategy in the United States once more at the edge of the area, with a U.S. naval experts, the words are: "the South China Sea from the United States more than 12,000 km, is too far away."
As the "United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea," entered into force in 1994, and China's rising influence in Southeast Asia, the basic policy of the United States started the South China Sea by the "no intervention" to "intervention, but not into." 1995, U.S. Department of Defense released the South China Sea policy: it will urge the peaceful settlement of the South China Sea countries strongly oppose the threat or use of military force to resolve disputes, and that peace and stability in the South China Sea has a long-term interests, reiterated that the United States on the "freedom of navigation" of the basic interests.
After that fight, the United States began to "freedom of navigation" as an excuse to make irresponsible remarks on the South China Sea issue. Since 1995, the United States began with Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei six Southeast Asian countries one by one, "Karat" series of military exercises. The exercise by the U.S. Navy's Western Pacific logistics co-ordination group, beginning in mid-year.
In recent years, especially in the Obama administration, the U.S. implementation of "return" to Southeast Asia strategy, the U.S. military has stepped up military activities in the South China Sea. It is in this context, the South China Sea in 2001 following the Sino-US plane collision incident, in June 2009 took place in the Chinese Navy submarine collided with the U.S. warship accident.
U.S. policy adjustment saw the South China Sea, Vietnam, the Philippines and other countries in recent years has been attempting to drag the United States involved in the South China Sea to the South China Sea on its increased clout unreasonable proposition. But the U.S. had in the whole South China Sea issue more carefully, essentially hidden behind the spoiler.
U.S. high-profile public involvement
Since March of this year, from U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Colin Campbell, to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the United States series of high-level government officials stand on the South China Sea issue. China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, Li Yan United States experts on the "News of the World" reporter that the United States has never been so clearly emphasized in the interests of the South China Sea.
March 10, in Southeast Asia to visit the Campbell position on the South China Sea, said the United States also has interests in the South China Sea, the United States wants to maintain "freedom of navigation" in the hope of negotiating the South China Sea dispute over sovereignty should be "multilateral", it should involve all Southeast Asian countries. In some neighboring countries, the South China Sea South China Sea issue already actively seeking multilateral, international, would have to hope that ASEAN and China as a whole negotiation situation, Campbell's remarks no doubt played a role in concert with one another.
More than a month before "Shangri-La Dialogue", U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates to explain the position of the United States of the South China Sea: the conflicting claims of sovereignty which the United States will not declare support for the party, but opposed the use of force, but also against prejudice "navigation free "behavior. A discerning eye will clear, these words appeared to be mainly to China to hear that.
Recently, the ASEAN Regional Forum security dialogue in the region, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. government around the Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands in the "dispute" expressed concern, saying this "dispute" has impeded the conduct of maritime trade, blocking other countries into the area of so-called "international waters." She also stressed that the United States is deeply concerned about "the South China Sea" a peaceful solution to help resolve related disputes "is the U.S. national interest."
Clinton's above statement caused uproar quickly. 25, Chinese Foreign Ministry Web site published a paper entitled "Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi to refute the distortion of the South China Sea issue," reported. Foreign Minister Yang sharply retorted that Clinton talked about the South China Sea with the U.S. national interest, to talk about the importance of maintaining freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and urgency, etc., "This looks like the speech is in fact fair to attack China, is to the international community to create a very bleak situation in the South China Sea fans like. "
Containment against China is internal
Li Yan experts believe that the United States, the United States increased emphasis on the South China Sea issue, we must first put the world in recent years interest in the marine and related background increasingly important in the view, increased competition for national marine rights and interests, enjoy the sea hegemony of the United States is no exception. In addition, Obama said after taking office, U.S. diplomacy should "return" to Southeast Asia, the South China Sea throughout the Asia-Pacific strategy in the United States stand out naturally.
According to foreign media analysis, the United States the reason why the South China Sea concerns the rapid increases may be another reason. In early March this year, China to visit the United States Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and the White House National Security Council senior director for Asian Affairs, Bedford, that are related to the South China Sea territorial integrity of China's "core interests" that position.
Li Yan of the reporter said, "Americans may think that since the South China Sea as a core interest of China, then we can put it in her power to restrain China. The more China's core interests, the more to challenge the United States, as the Taiwan issue, Tibet issue so. South China Sea issue will undoubtedly become the United States to contain China as an important starting point for prevention. "
At the same time, with the accelerated modernization of the Chinese Navy, the United States a number of strategic experts believe that China's sovereignty over the South China Sea are actually requested yes right the U.S. maritime hegemony of a challenge, therefore, the United States should, in the South China Sea to contain China.
Vietnam's occupation of the Nansha Islands and other countries want to move
China is the historical first discovered and named, the first under the jurisdiction of the Nansha Islands in the country, the Nansha Islands and adjacent waters has indisputable sovereignty. In the late 60th century, the United Nations announced that a large number of oil and gas resources found in the South China Sea before, no country on China's sovereignty over disputed South China Sea. Since the early 70s, Vietnam, the Philippines and other countries have illegally occupied South China Sea, a large number of Nansha Islands in the reefs.
Vietnam was the lone full sovereignty over the Nansha Islands in Southeast Asia, the South China Sea dispute is the biggest vested interests, currently in control of 28 reefs in the Spratly Islands (also has been reported 29). Vietnam not only on military deployment in the Nansha Islands, reefs to enhance share of the infrastructure, to encourage immigration, the Nansha sea area will also be divided into hundreds of oil and gas tender area, and the United States, Russia and other countries cooperative exploitation of petroleum and natural gas.
Also occupied a number of islands and reefs of Malaysia, the Philippines and other countries also cooperate with foreign oil companies for oil and gas resources exploitation of the South China Sea.
In recent years, Vietnam led to some Southeast Asian countries have been trying to South China Sea issue on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations summit to discuss, or even to cross the "Code of Conduct on the South China Sea," to re-sign an agreement. This was held in Hanoi during the ASEAN Regional Forum, the United States, Vietnam and other countries to the South China Sea "internationalization" of the attempt on the obvious. A hint in the United States, the participating 27 countries, 12 countries support the U.S. position.
Once behind the scenes spoiler
South China Sea was the Soviet Union during the Cold War confrontation with each other, supremacy of the seas, the two countries were established in the Philippines and Vietnam naval base. By the "Vietnam syndrome" of the impact of 80 Americans in the late 20th century into a deep self-reflection, and produce a "stay away from Southeast Asia" in the mood. After the Cold War, U.S. troops to leave the Philippines.
Since then, the South China Sea, the East Asia strategy in the United States once more at the edge of the area, with a U.S. naval experts, the words are: "the South China Sea from the United States more than 12,000 km, is too far away."
As the "United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea," entered into force in 1994, and China's rising influence in Southeast Asia, the basic policy of the United States started the South China Sea by the "no intervention" to "intervention, but not into." 1995, U.S. Department of Defense released the South China Sea policy: it will urge the peaceful settlement of the South China Sea countries strongly oppose the threat or use of military force to resolve disputes, and that peace and stability in the South China Sea has a long-term interests, reiterated that the United States on the "freedom of navigation" of the basic interests.
After that fight, the United States began to "freedom of navigation" as an excuse to make irresponsible remarks on the South China Sea issue. Since 1995, the United States began with Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei six Southeast Asian countries one by one, "Karat" series of military exercises. The exercise by the U.S. Navy's Western Pacific logistics co-ordination group, beginning in mid-year.
In recent years, especially in the Obama administration, the U.S. implementation of "return" to Southeast Asia strategy, the U.S. military has stepped up military activities in the South China Sea. It is in this context, the South China Sea in 2001 following the Sino-US plane collision incident, in June 2009 took place in the Chinese Navy submarine collided with the U.S. warship accident.
U.S. policy adjustment saw the South China Sea, Vietnam, the Philippines and other countries in recent years has been attempting to drag the United States involved in the South China Sea to the South China Sea on its increased clout unreasonable proposition. But the U.S. had in the whole South China Sea issue more carefully, essentially hidden behind the spoiler.
U.S. high-profile public involvement
Since March of this year, from U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Colin Campbell, to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the United States series of high-level government officials stand on the South China Sea issue. China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, Li Yan United States experts on the "News of the World" reporter that the United States has never been so clearly emphasized in the interests of the South China Sea.
March 10, in Southeast Asia to visit the Campbell position on the South China Sea, said the United States also has interests in the South China Sea, the United States wants to maintain "freedom of navigation" in the hope of negotiating the South China Sea dispute over sovereignty should be "multilateral", it should involve all Southeast Asian countries. In some neighboring countries, the South China Sea South China Sea issue already actively seeking multilateral, international, would have to hope that ASEAN and China as a whole negotiation situation, Campbell's remarks no doubt played a role in concert with one another.
More than a month before "Shangri-La Dialogue", U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates to explain the position of the United States of the South China Sea: the conflicting claims of sovereignty which the United States will not declare support for the party, but opposed the use of force, but also against prejudice "navigation free "behavior. A discerning eye will clear, these words appeared to be mainly to China to hear that.
Recently, the ASEAN Regional Forum security dialogue in the region, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. government around the Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands in the "dispute" expressed concern, saying this "dispute" has impeded the conduct of maritime trade, blocking other countries into the area of so-called "international waters." She also stressed that the United States is deeply concerned about "the South China Sea" a peaceful solution to help resolve related disputes "is the U.S. national interest."
Clinton's above statement caused uproar quickly. 25, Chinese Foreign Ministry Web site published a paper entitled "Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi to refute the distortion of the South China Sea issue," reported. Foreign Minister Yang sharply retorted that Clinton talked about the South China Sea with the U.S. national interest, to talk about the importance of maintaining freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and urgency, etc., "This looks like the speech is in fact fair to attack China, is to the international community to create a very bleak situation in the South China Sea fans like. "
Containment against China is internal
Li Yan experts believe that the United States, the United States increased emphasis on the South China Sea issue, we must first put the world in recent years interest in the marine and related background increasingly important in the view, increased competition for national marine rights and interests, enjoy the sea hegemony of the United States is no exception. In addition, Obama said after taking office, U.S. diplomacy should "return" to Southeast Asia, the South China Sea throughout the Asia-Pacific strategy in the United States stand out naturally.
According to foreign media analysis, the United States the reason why the South China Sea concerns the rapid increases may be another reason. In early March this year, China to visit the United States Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and the White House National Security Council senior director for Asian Affairs, Bedford, that are related to the South China Sea territorial integrity of China's "core interests" that position.
Li Yan of the reporter said, "Americans may think that since the South China Sea as a core interest of China, then we can put it in her power to restrain China. The more China's core interests, the more to challenge the United States, as the Taiwan issue, Tibet issue so. South China Sea issue will undoubtedly become the United States to contain China as an important starting point for prevention. "
At the same time, with the accelerated modernization of the Chinese Navy, the United States a number of strategic experts believe that China's sovereignty over the South China Sea are actually requested yes right the U.S. maritime hegemony of a challenge, therefore, the United States should, in the South China Sea to contain China.
Vietnam's occupation of the Nansha Islands and other countries want to move
China is the historical first discovered and named, the first under the jurisdiction of the Nansha Islands in the country, the Nansha Islands and adjacent waters has indisputable sovereignty. In the late 60th century, the United Nations announced that a large number of oil and gas resources found in the South China Sea before, no country on China's sovereignty over disputed South China Sea. Since the early 70s, Vietnam, the Philippines and other countries have illegally occupied South China Sea, a large number of Nansha Islands in the reefs.
Vietnam was the lone full sovereignty over the Nansha Islands in Southeast Asia, the South China Sea dispute is the biggest vested interests, currently in control of 28 reefs in the Spratly Islands (also has been reported 29). Vietnam not only on military deployment in the Nansha Islands, reefs to enhance share of the infrastructure, to encourage immigration, the Nansha sea area will also be divided into hundreds of oil and gas tender area, and the United States, Russia and other countries cooperative exploitation of petroleum and natural gas.
Also occupied a number of islands and reefs of Malaysia, the Philippines and other countries also cooperate with foreign oil companies for oil and gas resources exploitation of the South China Sea.
In recent years, Vietnam led to some Southeast Asian countries have been trying to South China Sea issue on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations summit to discuss, or even to cross the "Code of Conduct on the South China Sea," to re-sign an agreement. This was held in Hanoi during the ASEAN Regional Forum, the United States, Vietnam and other countries to the South China Sea "internationalization" of the attempt on the obvious. A hint in the United States, the participating 27 countries, 12 countries support the U.S. position.
Careful preparation:The United States may intervene in the South China Sea in a more intense way in future!
China Military Report: July 23, held in Vietnam's regional security forum, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to talk about stability in the region to resolve the South China Sea dispute on "critical", claimed the dispute hinder the conduct of maritime trade and hinder the other side into the area of international waters, the settlement of disputes "related to U.S. national interests." Subsequently, the Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi delivered a speech to be refuted.
South China Sea disputes the need for international, multilateral? Why the United States intervene in the South China Sea disputes, high profile? U.S. national interests in the South China Sea is under threat? This week, "Chen Hu Troops" with you to analyze the purpose of U.S. involvement in the South China Sea dispute.
Attempt to intervene in the South China Sea for three major reasons
Hillary Clinton is based on a manuscript prepared to make these remarks, which means this is not a temporary position, but after careful prior preparation.
To intervene in the South China Sea disputes, always have to have a reason, Hillary speak out so nothing less than a few reasons: First, the South China Sea dispute led to instability in the region, to resolve this dispute is conducive to promoting regional stability; the second is the current South China Sea dispute has affected this area of international shipping; there is the South China Sea disputes involving the U.S. national interest. Because of these reasons, the U.S. should intervene in the dispute.
As for the solution of the method, Hillary Clinton made it: the United States is willing to ASEAN, China and the countries together to discuss this issue and form a solution Xi Wang Zhe Yi issue of international mechanisms.
This made those remarks, national and international media in our country immediately aroused great attention.
We know, for historical reasons, the South China Sea dispute a long time, but all of these disputes are within the framework of bilateral consultations and settlement, which is a national (or regional) and another country (or region) between the bilateral disputes. The essence of the speech Hillary Clinton is to issue international, multilateral.
In the history of the South China Sea dispute does not lead to unrest and war
So, Clinton said the United States to intervene in the South China Sea disputes, the reasons justified?
First of all, basically the past half century can be divided into two, a former 25-year period is 25 years. Around the South China Sea should be said that the previous 25 years has been at war, the reasons that we are all familiar with the United States launched the war in Vietnam. In fact, the Vietnam War and even spread to neighboring India and other countries. Such as the U.S. military forces in combat operations, many are the Philippines, Thailand, some of the base to support it. After 25 years, rapid economic development in this region become the world's one of the fastest growing economy, which is 25 years exactly what the U.S. forces in the region is gradually removed from the period. Therefore, from a historical point of view, the South China Sea dispute and did not trigger the use of force against the region, and produce turbulence, but rather after the foreign forces into the region, given the region a war.
Second, the dispute affects the area of international shipping is more free to say do not fly. We see that not a single country in the region claim to normal trade and shipping have been affected. In fact, this area has been one of the busiest international sea shipping, international shipping has not been such a controversy, dispute of
The history of multilateral dispute settlement cases is a failure
Hillary's so-called South China Sea dispute settlement means that the United States to intervene, with multilateral and international approach. We must ask: Are you out of this "prescription" is not really the solution?
We also look at history. In fact, the existence of such dispute (or a similar dispute) to compare the concentration of many in the world or, in some areas is the use of this multilateral and international approach to try to resolve, but in fact have the effect of unsatisfactory. We all know the Middle East has been fighting for many years, until today, the Middle East dispute and the hidden danger of war is still not eliminated, but a lot of problems in this region are in precisely the so-called multilateral, international settlement framework, and is a long time dominated by the United States.
In other words, the bilateral consultations ways to solve the problem better, and this multilateral, international solutions are often caused more confusion, more difficult to solve.
The United States in the South China Sea "national interest" is what?
Since Hillary made these United States are insufficient grounds to intervene in the proposed solution is not a good idea, then why the United States hopes such a positive intervention in this problem?
If we now take another look at Hillary Clinton's speech, you will find the core of which is the point: South China Sea dispute settlement related to U.S. national interests.
As he said the national interest, we will immediately alert them: the United States, "National interest" is too much. No matter where, what problems, if the Americans stepped in, would say it is and the national stakeholders.
In fact, the U.S. national interests in the South China Sea region what is it?
First of all, international shipping is no problem; Second, business cooperation and development are being carried. Then, in the South China Sea but also the United States to seek any kind of national interests?
This is worthy of our attention.
The most recent performance from the U.S. perspective, the United States in the Asia-Pacific waters, "performing" quite well, first a series of maritime military exercises, such as "Pacific Rim -2010", Korea-US Multimodal speech and so on, now provoked South China Sea disputes. From these actions, we can see that the main concern for the United States recently put the sea in this region, we can feel the United States in the South China Sea region to seek the "national interest" described as "the plan have a large": This is not only a simple shipping and trade development, more U.S. hegemony in the region
U.S. attempts to act as "judge" rather than "peace dove"
In fact, the United States to intervene and its local community thousands of miles distant, in fact, not related to its core interests in a region not want to simply as a participant, but trying to act as a "judge" in role in the process to obtain the so-called "national interest."
In other words, the United States is not concerned about whether the South China Sea dispute is more fair, reasonable and proper solution, but the U.S. ability to participate in this process, so long as a "judge" the identity and role of the part in this process, then this process, the United States will certainly do our best to seek the so-called "national interest."
Each country has its own national interests, each country its own national interests as the highest, and never allow other countries to the so-called "national interests" above the top of their own. Once the national interests of different countries in contradiction and conflict, a conflict of interest related to the country should equal a fair and reasonable way of consultation and negotiation, and then resolve the conflict. But now, we see more of a certain country's "national interest" unilateral first situation.
As things stand, the United States claimed that the South China Sea dispute is merely involved in the diplomatic level, the future will not be more stronger, more intense way of getting involved in this area, we're not sure, but it does not rule it out.
In the past few decades, the U.S. military had entered the area, then was hit in the region, while themselves withdrew from the area. Now, the United States in its military power and trying to influence it back to the area involved, with the now popular lines of a cartoon where the one is this: "I will come back."
So, U.S. intervention in the South China Sea disputes, how to develop the future will bring, what kind of situation? The problem is that for a long period of time we should be a high degree of concern.
South China Sea disputes the need for international, multilateral? Why the United States intervene in the South China Sea disputes, high profile? U.S. national interests in the South China Sea is under threat? This week, "Chen Hu Troops" with you to analyze the purpose of U.S. involvement in the South China Sea dispute.
Attempt to intervene in the South China Sea for three major reasons
Hillary Clinton is based on a manuscript prepared to make these remarks, which means this is not a temporary position, but after careful prior preparation.
To intervene in the South China Sea disputes, always have to have a reason, Hillary speak out so nothing less than a few reasons: First, the South China Sea dispute led to instability in the region, to resolve this dispute is conducive to promoting regional stability; the second is the current South China Sea dispute has affected this area of international shipping; there is the South China Sea disputes involving the U.S. national interest. Because of these reasons, the U.S. should intervene in the dispute.
As for the solution of the method, Hillary Clinton made it: the United States is willing to ASEAN, China and the countries together to discuss this issue and form a solution Xi Wang Zhe Yi issue of international mechanisms.
This made those remarks, national and international media in our country immediately aroused great attention.
We know, for historical reasons, the South China Sea dispute a long time, but all of these disputes are within the framework of bilateral consultations and settlement, which is a national (or regional) and another country (or region) between the bilateral disputes. The essence of the speech Hillary Clinton is to issue international, multilateral.
In the history of the South China Sea dispute does not lead to unrest and war
So, Clinton said the United States to intervene in the South China Sea disputes, the reasons justified?
First of all, basically the past half century can be divided into two, a former 25-year period is 25 years. Around the South China Sea should be said that the previous 25 years has been at war, the reasons that we are all familiar with the United States launched the war in Vietnam. In fact, the Vietnam War and even spread to neighboring India and other countries. Such as the U.S. military forces in combat operations, many are the Philippines, Thailand, some of the base to support it. After 25 years, rapid economic development in this region become the world's one of the fastest growing economy, which is 25 years exactly what the U.S. forces in the region is gradually removed from the period. Therefore, from a historical point of view, the South China Sea dispute and did not trigger the use of force against the region, and produce turbulence, but rather after the foreign forces into the region, given the region a war.
Second, the dispute affects the area of international shipping is more free to say do not fly. We see that not a single country in the region claim to normal trade and shipping have been affected. In fact, this area has been one of the busiest international sea shipping, international shipping has not been such a controversy, dispute of
The history of multilateral dispute settlement cases is a failure
Hillary's so-called South China Sea dispute settlement means that the United States to intervene, with multilateral and international approach. We must ask: Are you out of this "prescription" is not really the solution?
We also look at history. In fact, the existence of such dispute (or a similar dispute) to compare the concentration of many in the world or, in some areas is the use of this multilateral and international approach to try to resolve, but in fact have the effect of unsatisfactory. We all know the Middle East has been fighting for many years, until today, the Middle East dispute and the hidden danger of war is still not eliminated, but a lot of problems in this region are in precisely the so-called multilateral, international settlement framework, and is a long time dominated by the United States.
In other words, the bilateral consultations ways to solve the problem better, and this multilateral, international solutions are often caused more confusion, more difficult to solve.
The United States in the South China Sea "national interest" is what?
Since Hillary made these United States are insufficient grounds to intervene in the proposed solution is not a good idea, then why the United States hopes such a positive intervention in this problem?
If we now take another look at Hillary Clinton's speech, you will find the core of which is the point: South China Sea dispute settlement related to U.S. national interests.
As he said the national interest, we will immediately alert them: the United States, "National interest" is too much. No matter where, what problems, if the Americans stepped in, would say it is and the national stakeholders.
In fact, the U.S. national interests in the South China Sea region what is it?
First of all, international shipping is no problem; Second, business cooperation and development are being carried. Then, in the South China Sea but also the United States to seek any kind of national interests?
This is worthy of our attention.
The most recent performance from the U.S. perspective, the United States in the Asia-Pacific waters, "performing" quite well, first a series of maritime military exercises, such as "Pacific Rim -2010", Korea-US Multimodal speech and so on, now provoked South China Sea disputes. From these actions, we can see that the main concern for the United States recently put the sea in this region, we can feel the United States in the South China Sea region to seek the "national interest" described as "the plan have a large": This is not only a simple shipping and trade development, more U.S. hegemony in the region
U.S. attempts to act as "judge" rather than "peace dove"
In fact, the United States to intervene and its local community thousands of miles distant, in fact, not related to its core interests in a region not want to simply as a participant, but trying to act as a "judge" in role in the process to obtain the so-called "national interest."
In other words, the United States is not concerned about whether the South China Sea dispute is more fair, reasonable and proper solution, but the U.S. ability to participate in this process, so long as a "judge" the identity and role of the part in this process, then this process, the United States will certainly do our best to seek the so-called "national interest."
Each country has its own national interests, each country its own national interests as the highest, and never allow other countries to the so-called "national interests" above the top of their own. Once the national interests of different countries in contradiction and conflict, a conflict of interest related to the country should equal a fair and reasonable way of consultation and negotiation, and then resolve the conflict. But now, we see more of a certain country's "national interest" unilateral first situation.
As things stand, the United States claimed that the South China Sea dispute is merely involved in the diplomatic level, the future will not be more stronger, more intense way of getting involved in this area, we're not sure, but it does not rule it out.
In the past few decades, the U.S. military had entered the area, then was hit in the region, while themselves withdrew from the area. Now, the United States in its military power and trying to influence it back to the area involved, with the now popular lines of a cartoon where the one is this: "I will come back."
So, U.S. intervention in the South China Sea disputes, how to develop the future will bring, what kind of situation? The problem is that for a long period of time we should be a high degree of concern.
Kamis, 29 Juli 2010
Western provoke Sino-Vietnamese relations, China will not allow the U.S. to enter the South China Sea
The relationship between China and Southeast Asian countries remain stable, Sino-Vietnamese relations is the key. China and Vietnam have relied on each other politically, relations between the two parties more solid overall, but in the Vietnam Sea dispute and relatively prominent, two countries fighting in Sai Sha. A few days ago Clinton announced that the U.S. national interest in the South China Sea, the speech was published in Vietnam.
Vietnam is Southeast Asia's second-largest population in the country, rapid economic growth. Vietnam, China's attitude will affect the other Southeast Asian countries. But from another perspective, the leadership of the Communist Party of Vietnam is the only country in Southeast Asia, in the antithesis of Western ideology, a strong and prosperous China is an important basis for the legitimacy of the Vietnamese system. China and Vietnam have crossed the territorial dispute, the strategic needs of friendship and common prosperity.
China and Vietnam in recent decades have had the experience of the joint anti-US, but also because of territorial dispute arises between the Duoci war, but now, the two officials have played down the conflict, the Vietnamese public opinion as the war is not like India obsession.
Some incite "hate China" suppression of intellectuals in Vietnam. Two weeks ago, more than 1300 km-long Sino-Vietnamese land border demarcation came into effect. And as early as six years ago, the two countries had implemented the northern Gulf maritime delimitation agreements, this is a maritime border with eight neighboring countries, only a controversial border demarcation agreement.
Both Vietnam and China in a close, they expect the United States a special point. And pulled in Vietnam, do not let it into the embrace of the West, around the grand strategy of China is important.
Use in Vietnam to destroy China's surrounding environment, and then to Southeast Asia to fight the forefront of obstructing the rise of China, the United States and some Western strategists long-term aspirations.
This year in February, the Pentagon report said, the United States deter China's aggressive trend in the South China Sea, Vietnam is an increasingly important strategic ally. Western media are keen to talk about conflicts and disputes, China and Vietnam, but few highlight the ideological bond between the two countries on China and Vietnam.
Western media often to China, compared to the "elephant", it is possible at any time the south, "the stepping Vietnam", similar to provoke civil society in Vietnam had an impact.
Western response to the rise of China, there may still greater efforts to win over Vietnam. But this strategy needs based approach used in Vietnam, can not last forever. Have been used in China against the Soviet Union and the West, but with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the strategic relationship between China and the West soon changed. Vietnam probably know what this.
China and Vietnam on the Spratly Islands dispute pressure, less than the Western system, the pressure on the Vietnamese society. China and Vietnam passed the road of reform and opening up very close to home and around the two countries have maintained stability and the desire to concentrate on economic development. To maintain relations with China in ensuring long-term political environment in Vietnam and are vital economic interests.
Vietnam need to be vigilant, not to let themselves into the U.S. strategy to contain and prevent the rise of China's pawn. China and Vietnam to resolve the territorial problem between the two countries have land borders and the northern Gulf example, the experience with the introduction of alien forces of the United States. China will not allow the United States in the South China Sea, the release of its free "national interest", the Vietnamese, they should not waver in the West before the spell.
Vietnam is Southeast Asia's second-largest population in the country, rapid economic growth. Vietnam, China's attitude will affect the other Southeast Asian countries. But from another perspective, the leadership of the Communist Party of Vietnam is the only country in Southeast Asia, in the antithesis of Western ideology, a strong and prosperous China is an important basis for the legitimacy of the Vietnamese system. China and Vietnam have crossed the territorial dispute, the strategic needs of friendship and common prosperity.
China and Vietnam in recent decades have had the experience of the joint anti-US, but also because of territorial dispute arises between the Duoci war, but now, the two officials have played down the conflict, the Vietnamese public opinion as the war is not like India obsession.
Some incite "hate China" suppression of intellectuals in Vietnam. Two weeks ago, more than 1300 km-long Sino-Vietnamese land border demarcation came into effect. And as early as six years ago, the two countries had implemented the northern Gulf maritime delimitation agreements, this is a maritime border with eight neighboring countries, only a controversial border demarcation agreement.
Both Vietnam and China in a close, they expect the United States a special point. And pulled in Vietnam, do not let it into the embrace of the West, around the grand strategy of China is important.
Use in Vietnam to destroy China's surrounding environment, and then to Southeast Asia to fight the forefront of obstructing the rise of China, the United States and some Western strategists long-term aspirations.
This year in February, the Pentagon report said, the United States deter China's aggressive trend in the South China Sea, Vietnam is an increasingly important strategic ally. Western media are keen to talk about conflicts and disputes, China and Vietnam, but few highlight the ideological bond between the two countries on China and Vietnam.
Western media often to China, compared to the "elephant", it is possible at any time the south, "the stepping Vietnam", similar to provoke civil society in Vietnam had an impact.
Western response to the rise of China, there may still greater efforts to win over Vietnam. But this strategy needs based approach used in Vietnam, can not last forever. Have been used in China against the Soviet Union and the West, but with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the strategic relationship between China and the West soon changed. Vietnam probably know what this.
China and Vietnam on the Spratly Islands dispute pressure, less than the Western system, the pressure on the Vietnamese society. China and Vietnam passed the road of reform and opening up very close to home and around the two countries have maintained stability and the desire to concentrate on economic development. To maintain relations with China in ensuring long-term political environment in Vietnam and are vital economic interests.
Vietnam need to be vigilant, not to let themselves into the U.S. strategy to contain and prevent the rise of China's pawn. China and Vietnam to resolve the territorial problem between the two countries have land borders and the northern Gulf example, the experience with the introduction of alien forces of the United States. China will not allow the United States in the South China Sea, the release of its free "national interest", the Vietnamese, they should not waver in the West before the spell.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)